People v. Baldwin
4 N.Y.S. 608, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 906, 51 Hun 642, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1623
Opinion
It is not disputed that the court of sessions had power to modify the sentence of the court of special sessions. We think, therefore, that although the defendant pleaded guilty, yet he had the right to have the court of sessions exercise its discretion as to the sentence. The order dismissing the appeal is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Baldwin, 4 N.Y.S. 608, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 906, 51 Hun 642, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1623 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
4 N.Y.S. 608 (People v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Brisman
2025 NY Slip Op 00123 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)
People v. Kahn
29 N.Y. Crim. 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)