People v. Baldares-Lima
This text of 29 A.D.3d 813 (People v. Baldares-Lima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the [814]*814defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit (see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114 [2003]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 813, 813 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baldares-lima-nyappdiv-2006.