People v. Baldares-Lima

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Baldares-Lima

29 A.D.3d 813, 813 N.Y.S.2d 909

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the [814]*814defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit (see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114 [2003]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the [814]*814defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit (see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114 [2003]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

People v. Baldares-Lima, 29 A.D.3d 813, 813 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

29 A.D.3d 813 (People v. Baldares-Lima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related