People v. Baker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.3d 1198
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2026·No. 39 KA 23-00978·Published

Opinion

People v Baker (2026 NY Slip Op 01641)
People v Baker
2026 NY Slip Op 01641
Decided on March 20, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: BANNISTER, J.P., MONTOUR, SMITH, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.

39 KA 23-00978

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

LAWRENCE D. BAKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


ANDREW D. CORREIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS, EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (BRIAN SHIFFRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CHRISTINE CALLANAN, ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (CATHERINE A. MENIKOTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Richard M. Healy, J.), rendered April 5, 2023. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered May 2, 2025, decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Wayne County Court for further proceedings (238 AD3d 1507 [4th Dept 2025]). The proceedings were held and completed.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). We previously twice held this case, reserved decision, and remitted the matter to County Court for a determination whether the People were ready for trial within the requisite time period (People v Baker, 238 AD3d 1507 [4th Dept 2025]; People v Baker, 229 AD3d 1324 [4th Dept 2024]). Upon the most recent remittal, the court determined that the People were not ready for trial within the requisite time period and granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. Defendant subsequently died. Under these circumstances, we dismiss the appeal (see generally People v Matteson, 75 NY2d 745, 747 [1989]; People v Mintz, 20 NY2d 753, 754 [1967]).

Entered: March 20, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baker, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

People v. Baker (People v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mintz
229 N.E.2d 712 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Matteson
551 N.E.2d 91 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)