People v. Baker

134 A.D.2d 906, 522 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.2d 491

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of second degree murder for the death of a 14-year-old girl, defendant raises several claims, only one of

[907]*907which requires discussion. Defendant’s claim that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him is without merit. The record at the suppression hearing established that defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the station for questioning (see, People v Grippo, 124 AD2d 985, lv denied 69 NY2d 881). The police informed defendant of his Miranda rights and informed him they were now investigating a homicide, not a missing person complaint. Defendant then voluntarily confessed to the murder. Thus, the police had probable cause to arrest defendant at the police station (see, People v Oates, 104 AD2d 907, 912; People v Mertens, 97 AD2d 595; People v Ellis, 83 AD2d 652). We have considered defendant’s remaining claims and find that each lacks merit. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Sullivan, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baker, 134 A.D.2d 906, 522 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

134 A.D.2d 906 (People v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ellis
83 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Mertens
97 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Oates
104 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Grippo
124 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)