People v. Baker
228 N.E.2d 695, 19 N.Y.2d 982, 281 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1396
Opinion
In each action: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Breitel. Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the imposition of consecutive sentences for the crimes of unlawful entry and petit larceny arising out of a single transaction violated section 1938 of the Penal Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Baker, 228 N.E.2d 695, 19 N.Y.2d 982, 281 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1396 (N.Y. 1967).
228 N.E.2d 695 (People v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert McCullough v. Floyd Bennett
413 F.3d 244 (Second Circuit, 2005)
People v. Abreu
184 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Day
535 N.E.2d 1325 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Scandell
143 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Wise
351 N.W.2d 255 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Longendyke
56 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Mead v. State
489 P.2d 738 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1971)