People v. Bakare

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bakare

280 A.D.2d 679, 721 N.Y.S.2d 242, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 2001·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), imposed May 25, 2000, upon his conviction of assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, the sentence being a determinate term of one year imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of imprisonment from one year to 364 days.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the defendant’s sentence should be reduced by one day (see, People v Cuaran, 261 AD2d 169). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Mc-Ginity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), imposed May 25, 2000, upon his conviction of assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, the sentence being a determinate term of one year imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of imprisonment from one year to 364 days.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the defendant’s sentence should be reduced by one day (see, People v Cuaran, 261 AD2d 169). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Mc-Ginity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

People v. Bakare, 280 A.D.2d 679, 721 N.Y.S.2d 242, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

280 A.D.2d 679 (People v. Bakare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related