People v. Baisley

124 A.D.3d 485, 1 N.Y.S.3d 94
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 2015·No. 13972 30215/11·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel McCullough, J.), entered on or about May 23, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 *486 [2014]). The underlying offense was committed against two 13-year-old girls, and defendant has not established that his alleged good behavior in the years following his release from prison warrants a downward departure. In any event, while defendant was not convicted of any sex offenses after his release, he was convicted of a weapon offense. We have considered and rejected defendant’s argument that there was an overassessment of points under certain risk factors.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baisley, 124 A.D.3d 485, 1 N.Y.S.3d 94 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 485 (People v. Baisley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Leake
2018 NY Slip Op 8516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)