People v. Bain

126 A.D.2d 985, 511 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42108

This text of 126 A.D.2d 985 (People v. Bain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bain, 126 A.D.2d 985, 511 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

—Adjudication unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The People concede that, because defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender, it was improper for the court to impose a mandatory surcharge (see, People v Floyd J., 61 NY2d 895). The penalty assessment must, therefore, be vacated. (Appeal from adjudication of Onondaga County Court, Van Auser, J.—youthful offender.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Floyd J.
462 N.E.2d 1194 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.2d 985, 511 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bain-nyappdiv-1987.