People v. Bailey

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Bailey

186 N.W.2d 21, 30 Mich. App. 252, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2212

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 28, 1971

DocketDocket No. 10022

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.W.2d 21 (People v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bailey, 186 N.W.2d 21, 30 Mich. App. 252, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2212 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is submitted on the people’s motion to affirm. Defendant appeals from his conviction upon a plea of guilty to the offense of assault with intent to rob while armed. MCLA § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284). He was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal he claims that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilty in the presence of counsel substituted for his court-appointed attorney of record. The guilty plea transcript, however, reveals that such substitution was accomplished with the permission of the defendant. In addition, we cannot discern any way in which defendant was prejudiced as a result of this substitution. People v. Douglas (1966), 4 Mich App 208.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is submitted on the people’s motion to affirm. Defendant appeals from his conviction upon a plea of guilty to the offense of assault with intent to rob while armed. MCLA § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284). He was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal he claims that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilty in the presence of counsel substituted for his court-appointed attorney of record. The guilty plea transcript, however, reveals that such substitution was accomplished with the permission of the defendant. In addition, we cannot discern any way in which defendant was prejudiced as a result of this substitution. People v. Douglas (1966), 4 Mich App 208.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.W.2d 21, 30 Mich. App. 252, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bailey-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack