People v. Bah

2019 NY Slip Op 2484
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bah. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 NY Slip Op 00823
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2019·No. 8881 1137/15·Published

Opinion

People v Bah (2019 NY Slip Op 02484)
People v Bah
2019 NY Slip Op 02484
Decided on April 2, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 2, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

8881 1137/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Malick Bah, Defendant-Appellant.


Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Amanda Rolat of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Waleska Suero Garcia of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alvin Yearwood, J.), rendered September 27, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 2, 2019

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bah, 2019 NY Slip Op 2484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 2484 (People v. Bah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431