People v. Bah
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2484 (People v. Bah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Bah |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 02484 |
| Decided on April 2, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 2, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
8881 1137/15
v
Malick Bah, Defendant-Appellant.
Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Amanda Rolat of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Waleska Suero Garcia of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alvin Yearwood, J.), rendered September 27, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 2, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 2484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bah-nyappdiv-2019.