People v. Bagley

210 A.D.3d 791, 176 N.Y.S.3d 495, 2022 NY Slip Op 06255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bagley. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 A.D.3d 1475
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2022·No. 2019-13043·Published

Opinion

People v Bagley (2022 NY Slip Op 06255)
People v Bagley
2022 NY Slip Op 06255
Decided on November 9, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 9, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LARA J. GENOVESI
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2019-13043

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Michael Bagley, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 90211/19)


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and George D. Adames of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Marina Cora Mundy, J.), rendered October 16, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, GENOVESI and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bagley, 210 A.D.3d 791, 176 N.Y.S.3d 495, 2022 NY Slip Op 06255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

210 A.D.3d 791 (People v. Bagley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)