People v. Baez

77 A.D.3d 406, 907 N.Y.S.2d 867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Darcel D. Clark, J.), entered on or about August 14, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendant challenges a particular 15-point assessment, even without that assessment he would remain a level two offender, and we find no basis for a discretionary downward departure from defendant’s presumptive risk level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). The mitigating circumstances cited by defendant were adequately taken , into account by the risk assessment instrument. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, McGuire, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baez, 77 A.D.3d 406, 907 N.Y.S.2d 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 406 (People v. Baez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendez
79 A.D.3d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)