People v. Baez

209 A.D.2d 530, 619 N.Y.S.2d 627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Baez. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 121

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered August 27, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record indicates that he received effective assistance of counsel at the plea proceeding (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146; People v Radia, 159 AD2d 577).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baez, 209 A.D.2d 530, 619 N.Y.S.2d 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 530 (People v. Baez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Badia
159 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)