People v. Baer

New York Court of Common Pleas

People v. Baer

7 N.Y.S. 660, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 412, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1228

DecidedDecember 2, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 660 (People v. Baer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Baer, 7 N.Y.S. 660, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 412, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1228 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The prisoner was guilty of cruelty to a horse, and was to appear for trial on October 14, 1886, at the court of special sessions. The surety and the petitioner were present, but failed to answer, the excuse being that they did not hear their names called. The recognizance was thereupon forfeited. On December 2, 1886, the prisoner was produced by the surety for trial at the special sessions, and was convicted of the offense, and adjudged to pay a fine of $5, which was paid. It does not appear that the people lost any rights by their default. The application should therefore be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The prisoner was guilty of cruelty to a horse, and was to appear for trial on October 14, 1886, at the court of special sessions. The surety and the petitioner were present, but failed to answer, the excuse being that they did not hear their names called. The recognizance was thereupon forfeited. On December 2, 1886, the prisoner was produced by the surety for trial at the special sessions, and was convicted of the offense, and adjudged to pay a fine of $5, which was paid. It does not appear that the people lost any rights by their default. The application should therefore be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.Y.S. 660, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 412, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baer-nyctcompl-1889.