People v. Badolato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Badolato

222 A.D.2d 1023, 636 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14068

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. Badolato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Badolato, 222 A.D.2d 1023, 636 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judg[1024]*1024ment convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, defendant contends that the suppression court erred in refusing to suppress physical evidence and his statement. For the reasons stated in the suppression court’s decision, we conclude that defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We further conclude that the proof of intent is legally sufficient and that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judg[1024]*1024ment convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, defendant contends that the suppression court erred in refusing to suppress physical evidence and his statement. For the reasons stated in the suppression court’s decision, we conclude that defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We further conclude that the proof of intent is legally sufficient and that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 1023, 636 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-badolato-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack