People v. Bach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bach

31 A.D.2d 809, 297 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 809 (People v. Bach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bach, 31 A.D.2d 809, 297 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent insofar as it is to amend, change and settle the transcript of the record on appeal is referred to the County Court, Dutchess County. Where, as in the case at bar, the Trial Judge had died, and the transcript of the stenographic minutes cannot be settled by the attorneys for the parties, this court, pursuant to statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 458), at the request of a parity, may provide for the settlement of the transcript in such manner as this court directs (see People v. Gallella, 23 A D 2d 285; see, also, CPLR 5525, 9002). Motion by respondent, insofar as it is to enlarge time, granted as follows: time to serve and file respondent’s brief enlarged to March 17, 1969; appeal adjourned to the April Term, which begins March 31, 1969. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent insofar as it is to amend, change and settle the transcript of the record on appeal is referred to the County Court, Dutchess County. Where, as in the case at bar, the Trial Judge had died, and the transcript of the stenographic minutes cannot be settled by the attorneys for the parties, this court, pursuant to statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 458), at the request of a parity, may provide for the settlement of the transcript in such manner as this court directs (see People v. Gallella, 23 A D 2d 285; see, also, CPLR 5525, 9002). Motion by respondent, insofar as it is to enlarge time, granted as follows: time to serve and file respondent’s brief enlarged to March 17, 1969; appeal adjourned to the April Term, which begins March 31, 1969. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 809, 297 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bach-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack