People v. Ayoub
This text of 289 A.D.2d 413 (People v. Ayoub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered June 18, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Offenses related to possession of controlled substances are not lesser-included offenses of those crimes prohibiting their sale. Therefore, the defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree is not a lesser-included offense of criminal sale of controlled substance in the third degree subject to dismissal pursuant to CPL 300.40 (3) (b) (see, People v Reed, 222 AD2d 459; People v Teixeira, 101 AD2d 818). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 A.D.2d 413, 734 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ayoub-nyappdiv-2001.