People v. Ayala

163 A.D.2d 876, 559 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ayala. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 A.D.2d 147

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court found that the photographic and lineup procedures employed by the police were not improperly suggestive and that the witnesses had an independent basis for their identification testimony. Those conclusions are supported by the record and thus defendant’s Wade motion was properly denied. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ayala, 163 A.D.2d 876, 559 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 876 (People v. Ayala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.