People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ayala

40 A.D.2d 832, 337 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 832 (People v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ayala, 40 A.D.2d 832, 337 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed November 4, 1971, committing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not, to exceed three years, upon a conviction of attempted sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree, on a plea of guilty. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the County Court for resentence in accordance with sections 207 and 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law. Defendant was charged with an offense under article 220.00 of the Penal Law; and information contained in the presentence investigation report indicated that he was a narcotic addict. Accordingly, he could not be sentenced until there was compliance with sections 207 and 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law (People v. Sczerbaty, 37 A D 2d 428; People v. Largue, 38 A D 2d 833; People v. Esperto, 40 A D 2d 834). We give no [833]*833indication as to what sentence should be imposed by the trial court. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed November 4, 1971, committing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not, to exceed three years, upon a conviction of attempted sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree, on a plea of guilty. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the County Court for resentence in accordance with sections 207 and 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law. Defendant was charged with an offense under article 220.00 of the Penal Law; and information contained in the presentence investigation report indicated that he was a narcotic addict. Accordingly, he could not be sentenced until there was compliance with sections 207 and 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law (People v. Sczerbaty, 37 A D 2d 428; People v. Largue, 38 A D 2d 833; People v. Esperto, 40 A D 2d 834). We give no [833]*833indication as to what sentence should be imposed by the trial court. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 832, 337 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ayala-nyappdiv-1972.