People v. Ayala

35 A.D.2d 930, 316 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212

This text of 35 A.D.2d 930 (People v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ayala, 35 A.D.2d 930, 316 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ. Markewich, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I concur in the result reached by the court, I feel that it must be noted specifically that the quoted pronouncement of Bios finds its basis solely in the excerpted sentence of section 208, and not by analogy to a criminal trial. Bios changes not one whit the holding of People v. Fuller (24 N Y 2d 292) that “various constitutional requirements applicable to criminal trials are not necessary here [p. 307] ” and “that the requisites of a criminal trial are not applicable to these proceedings [p. 304] ”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.D.2d 930, 316 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ayala-nyappdiv-1970.