People v. Avrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Avrams

6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Avrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Avrams, 6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from (1) a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant [879]*879of violating section 1424 of the Penal Law (giving a false alarm of fire), (2) from an order denying her motion to set aside the finding of guilty, designated in the notice of appeal as the “ conviction ”, and (3) from the sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the order denying the motion to set aside the “conviction” or from the sentence, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment of conviction and to dismiss the information, on the ground that the crime charged was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from (1) a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant [879]*879of violating section 1424 of the Penal Law (giving a false alarm of fire), (2) from an order denying her motion to set aside the finding of guilty, designated in the notice of appeal as the “ conviction ”, and (3) from the sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the order denying the motion to set aside the “conviction” or from the sentence, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment of conviction and to dismiss the information, on the ground that the crime charged was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-avrams-nyappdiv-1958.