People v. Aviles

223 A.D.3d 482, 201 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2024 NY Slip Op 00149
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 2024
DocketInd. No. 99001/18 Appeal No. 1380 Case No. 2018-03253
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 A.D.3d 482 (People v. Aviles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Aviles, 223 A.D.3d 482, 201 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2024 NY Slip Op 00149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Aviles (2024 NY Slip Op 00149)
People v Aviles
2024 NY Slip Op 00149
Decided on January 11, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 11, 2024
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Kapnick, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Ind. No. 99001/18 Appeal No. 1380 Case No. 2018-03253

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Nelson Aviles, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ashley A. Baxter of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kalani A. Browne of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). The egregiousness of the underlying offense, and defendant's prior similar conduct against other victims, indicate that a high degree of harm would result if defendant were to reoffend (see People v Gajadhar, 103 AD3d 572, 572 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 856 [2013]). Defendant has not demonstrated that the mitigating factors he cites, including his age

and longtime stability, warranted a downward departure.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 11, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Felix
2025 NY Slip Op 06553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Melendez
2025 NY Slip Op 06289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Jefferson
2024 NY Slip Op 06547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.3d 482, 201 N.Y.S.3d 61, 2024 NY Slip Op 00149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aviles-nyappdiv-2024.