People v. Aviles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aviles

287 A.D.2d 291, 730 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.D.2d 291 (People v. Aviles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aviles, 287 A.D.2d 291, 730 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered September 17, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and six counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 21/2 to 5 years concurrent with six terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the plausibility of the testimony provided by the police and by defendant, were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which [292]*292to disturb its determinations. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered September 17, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and six counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 21/2 to 5 years concurrent with six terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the plausibility of the testimony provided by the police and by defendant, were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which [292]*292to disturb its determinations. Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 291, 730 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aviles-nyappdiv-2001.