People v. Aviles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aviles

118 A.D.2d 862, 500 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 118 A.D.2d 862 (People v. Aviles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aviles, 118 A.D.2d 862, 500 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered August 19, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (two counts), criminal use of drug paraphernalia, and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[863]*863dant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered August 19, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (two counts), criminal use of drug paraphernalia, and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[863]*863dant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 862, 500 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aviles-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack