People v. Avent

43 A.D.3d 1174, 841 N.Y.S.2d 806
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Avent. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 A.D.3d 601

Opinion

by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 2, 2006 (People v Avent, 29 AD3d 601 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered October 23, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Krausman and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Avent, 43 A.D.3d 1174, 841 N.Y.S.2d 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

43 A.D.3d 1174 (People v. Avent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Avent
29 A.D.3d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)