People v. Austin

129 A.D.2d 583, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Austin. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 A.D.2d 242

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Potoker, J.), both rendered October 10, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree under indictment No. 5403/83, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 4366/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

[584]*584Ordered that the judgments are affirmed (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

The defendant’s contention that his pleas should be vacated and his sentences set aside because he did not receive a psychiatric examination is without merit. There was no proper basis for questioning his sanity (see, People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se brief, and have found them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Austin, 129 A.D.2d 583, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

129 A.D.2d 583 (People v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Armlin
332 N.E.2d 870 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)