People v. Austin

19 A.D.2d 674, 241 N.Y.S.2d 443

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County rendered upon a verdict convicting him of the first and second counts of a fouiveount indictment charging the crimes of criminally receiving stolen property -and criminally concealing and withholding stolen property. (Penal Law, § 1308.) The evidence clearly established the guilt of defendant and the proof abundantly sustains the convictions. We find no merit in the assignments of error in respect to the admission of evidence offered by the People. Nor can we say that the sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive. There is no showing tho-t any juror participating in the trial had read the newspaper account the publication of which is claimed to have interfered with defendant’s right to -a fair trial. Upon this record the trial court [675] did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. - (People v. Lubin, 190 App. Div. 339, affd. 229 N. Y. 601; People v. Genovese, 10 N Y 2d 478.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Austin, 19 A.D.2d 674, 241 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

19 A.D.2d 674 (People v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Lubin
129 N.E. 924 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
People v. Lubin
190 A.D. 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)