People v. Augustine

136 A.D.3d 678, 23 N.Y.S.3d 911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 2013-05135·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), dated May 16, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s contention that he was improperly assessed points under risk factors 9 and 10 based upon his prior youthful offender adjudication, in violation of CPL 720.35 (2), is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v Francis, 137 AD3d 91 [2d Dept 2016]).

Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Augustine, 136 A.D.3d 678, 23 N.Y.S.3d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 678 (People v. Augustine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Francis
137 A.D.3d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)