People v. Augusta

22 A.D.2d 925, 255 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2485
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion by defendant pro se for leave to dispense with printing, for assignment of counsel and for enlargement of time to prosecute appeal from judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 15, 1964. The motion is dismissed. There is no appeal pending. It appears that a timely notice of appeal has neither been filed nor served. The court cannot extend the time to appeal even if, as claimed by defendant in this case, the failure to take a timely appeal is due to the negligence of the attorney retained by the defendant for the purpose of the appeal (cf. People v. Kling, 14 N Y 2d 571, affg. 19 A D 2d 750; People v. Marchese, 14 N Y 2d 695, affg. 19 A D 2d 728). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Augusta, 22 A.D.2d 925, 255 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

22 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Augusta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related