People v. Augusta
This text of 22 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Augusta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by defendant pro se for leave to dispense with printing, for assignment of counsel and for enlargement of time to prosecute appeal from judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 15, 1964. The motion is dismissed. There is no appeal pending. It appears that a timely notice of appeal has neither been filed nor served. The court cannot extend the time to appeal even if, as claimed by defendant in this case, the failure to take a timely appeal is due to the negligence of the attorney retained by the defendant for the purpose of the appeal (cf. People v. Kling, 14 N Y 2d 571, affg. 19 A D 2d 750; People v. Marchese, 14 N Y 2d 695, affg. 19 A D 2d 728). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.2d 925, 255 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-augusta-nyappdiv-1964.