People v. Atwood

499 Mich. 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Atwood. Read the opinion of the Court — 499 Mich. 865
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2016·No. No. 152354; Court of Appeals No. 327566·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we grant the [924]*924motions to remand and appoint counsel and vacate the orders of the Court of Appeals and Ottawa Circuit Court. We remand this case to the Ottawa Circuit Court for a hearing pursuant to United States v Tucker, 404 US 443; 92 S Ct 589; 30 L Ed 2d 592 (1972), and People v Moore, 391 Mich 426 (1974), with regard to the scoring of Prior Offense Variable 5. On a showing of indigency, the trial court shall appoint counsel to assist the defendant. The motion for a declaratory judgment and motion to quash answer are denied. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Atwood, 499 Mich. 923 (Mich. 2016).

499 Mich. 923 (People v. Atwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tucker
404 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1972)
People v. Moore
216 N.W.2d 770 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)