People v. Atunrase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Atunrase

193 A.D.2d 808, 598 N.Y.S.2d 996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 808 (People v. Atunrase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Atunrase, 193 A.D.2d 808, 598 N.Y.S.2d 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), rendered March 25, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; see also, People v Gonzalez, 188 AD2d 548; People v Sanchez, 182 AD2d 845; People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), rendered March 25, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; see also, People v Gonzalez, 188 AD2d 548; People v Sanchez, 182 AD2d 845; People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 808, 598 N.Y.S.2d 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-atunrase-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack