People v. Attardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Attardi

114 A.D.2d 963, 495 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 A.D.2d 963 (People v. Attardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Attardi, 114 A.D.2d 963, 495 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered January 6, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not preserved his claims for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Warren, 47 NY2d 740). In any event, we find that the allocution established the requisite elements of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (see, People v Serrano, 15 NY2d 304, 308; People v Wedgewood, 106 AD2d 674). Furthermore, defendant knowingly and intelligently entered the plea (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered January 6, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not preserved his claims for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Warren, 47 NY2d 740). In any event, we find that the allocution established the requisite elements of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (see, People v Serrano, 15 NY2d 304, 308; People v Wedgewood, 106 AD2d 674). Furthermore, defendant knowingly and intelligently entered the plea (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 963, 495 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-attardi-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack