People v. Atlas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Atlas

114 A.D.2d 504, 494 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53211

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 A.D.2d 504 (People v. Atlas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Atlas, 114 A.D.2d 504, 494 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered March 14, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant requested the trial court to instruct the jury that his possession of the weapon might have been innocent. However, viewing the record in the light most favorable to defendant (see, People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 529), no evidence was adduced showing that defendant had a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession (see, People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043). Hence, in these circumstances, an innocent possession charge was not warranted.

The record amply supports the jury’s verdict. There was [505]*505credible, direct evidence linking defendant to possession of the weapon. Therefore, defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a circumstantial evidence instruction is meritless (see, People v Ruiz, 52 NY2d 929). O’Connor, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered March 14, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant requested the trial court to instruct the jury that his possession of the weapon might have been innocent. However, viewing the record in the light most favorable to defendant (see, People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 529), no evidence was adduced showing that defendant had a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession (see, People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043). Hence, in these circumstances, an innocent possession charge was not warranted.

The record amply supports the jury’s verdict. There was [505]*505credible, direct evidence linking defendant to possession of the weapon. Therefore, defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a circumstantial evidence instruction is meritless (see, People v Ruiz, 52 NY2d 929). O’Connor, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 504, 494 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-atlas-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack