People v. Atkinson

853 N.E.2d 227, 7 N.Y.3d 765, 819 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2006 NY Slip Op 5234, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1838
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 5, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by76 cases

This text of 853 N.E.2d 227 (People v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Atkinson, 853 N.E.2d 227, 7 N.Y.3d 765, 819 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2006 NY Slip Op 5234, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1838 (N.Y. 2006).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reducing defendant’s conviction of depraved indifference murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) to manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]), and by remitting the case to Supreme Court for resentencing and, as so modified, affirmed. Defendant did not commit depraved indifference murder within the meaning of the statute (see People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]).

We reject the contention that defendant forfeited his right to challenge the sufficiency of his conviction for depraved indifference murder by requesting that the jury be charged on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the second degree, which requires a finding of recklessness. “Depraved indifference” is an additional core statutory requirement of depraved indifference murder, beyond mere recklessness and risk (see People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 214-215 [2005]).

In our corrective action here, however, dismissal of the indictment is neither required nor warranted. The facts are suf *767 ficiently different from Payne to enable a jury to reasonably conclude that defendant’s actions, although not depraved, were reckless. Among other evidence, testimony at trial could have led a rational jury to infer that the victim moved into a shot that was intended only to scare him.

Accordingly, we need not reach the question of whether by requesting the lesser-included charge of manslaughter in the second degree, defendant forfeited his present claim that the evidence is consistent only with intentional murder.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Read and R.S. Smith concur; Judge Graffeo concurs in result on constraint of People v Suarez (6 NY3d 202 [2005]).

Order modified by reducing defendant’s conviction of murder in the second degree to manslaughter in the second degree and remitting to Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing and, as so modified, affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Spinks
2025 NY Slip Op 04303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Williams
185 N.Y.S.3d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Kenney
176 N.Y.S.3d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Mighty
203 A.D.3d 1687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Bursey
2017 NY Slip Op 7793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Johnson
2017 NY Slip Op 6768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Cotton
2017 NY Slip Op 6749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
ZEITZ, JAMES A., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
SPIRLES, MICHELLE D., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
BROWN, ERNEST, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
KALINOWSKI, ROBIN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
MILLER, CLARENCE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
CORDERO, CIRITO M., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
JOHNSON, GREGORY, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Barboni
994 N.E.2d 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
LUDWIG, DANIEL A., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
GASTON, VICTOR, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Gaston
104 A.D.3d 1206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Ludwig
104 A.D.3d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Martinez
983 N.E.2d 751 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 N.E.2d 227, 7 N.Y.3d 765, 819 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2006 NY Slip Op 5234, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-atkinson-ny-2006.