People v. Atkins
This text of 92 A.D.3d 551 (People v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record establishes the voluntariness of defendant’s plea, and the court properly denied defendant’s plea withdrawal motion (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). During the plea allocution, whenever defendant made a statement creating an ambiguity about the voluntariness of the plea, the court made a further inquiry that established that defendant was pleading guilty of his own free will. The court made clear to defendant that it was his choice whether to plead guilty or go to trial.
We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 551, 938 N.Y.2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-atkins-nyappdiv-2012.