People v. Atkins

240 A.D. 978

Opinion

Order granting application of the claimant respondent for an order requiring the receiver to pay to the administrator c. t. a. of Henry V. Herrmann, deceased, the sum of $872.39 as the proceeds of a certain Pennsylvania Consolidated Railroad Company unregistered bond, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The claimant did not sufficiently establish that the proceeds of this bond, to the amount indicated, came into the hands of the receiver, and further, did not sufficiently trace and identify such cash and property as came into the receiver’s hands as being the proceeds of the wrongful sale of the bond referred to. (Matter of Cavin v. Gleason, 105 N. Y. 256; Matter of Hicks, 170 id. 195, 198; Cole v. Cole, 54 App. Div. 37.) People v. City Bank of Rochester (96 N. Y. 32) and Gorman v. Littlefield [979] (229 U. S. 19) are distinguishable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Atkins, 240 A.D. 978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 978 (People v. Atkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gorman v. Littlefield
229 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Matter of Cavin v. . Gleason
11 N.E. 504 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
The People v. . the City Bank of Rochester
96 N.Y. 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Cole v. Cole
54 A.D. 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)