People v. Ashman

280 A.D.2d 483, 720 N.Y.S.2d 524, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1217
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 483 (People v. Ashman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ashman, 280 A.D.2d 483, 720 N.Y.S.2d 524, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered March 10, 1998, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of assault in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict of guilt on the charge of assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10 (1) (intent to cause serious physical injury) is inconsistent with the verdict of guilt on the charge of assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10 (3) (circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life). This contention is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to raise it prior to the discharge of the jury (see, People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985; People v Thomches, 172 AD2d 786), and we decline to consider it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Thomches, supra, at 787).

However, where “the verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count” (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848). Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree must be vacated and that count of the indictment dismissed (see, People v Rivera, 268 AD2d 538).

[484]*484The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Soto
31 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 483, 720 N.Y.S.2d 524, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ashman-nyappdiv-2001.