People v. Ashley

44 A.D.3d 536, 843 N.Y.S.2d 506
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ashley. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 1286

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered June 5, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of four years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

The court improperly precluded defendant from calling a witness, as a sanction for defendant’s failure to serve an alibi notice. The People correctly concede that it was an abuse of discretion to impose the drastic sanction of preclusion rather than offering the People a short adjournment pursuant to CPL 250.20 (3), in that defendant had not acted willfully or prejudiced the People, who were already aware of the witness’s grand jury and suppression hearing testimony and her pedigree information. As the People also concede, the error was not harmless under the circumstances of the case. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ashley, 44 A.D.3d 536, 843 N.Y.S.2d 506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 536 (People v. Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.