People v. Ashford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ashford

184 A.D.2d 972, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 972 (People v. Ashford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ashford, 184 A.D.2d 972, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schuyler County (Callanan, Sr., J.), rendered December 14, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the third degree.

Insofar as defendant had not been previously arraigned on the subject charges in a local criminal court, notice of presentment of the case to the Grand Jury was not required (see, CPL 190.50 [5] [a]; cf., People v Bey-Allah, 132 AD2d 76). The record also reveals that defendant’s constitutional right to the effec[973]*973tive assistance of counsel was not violated (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schuyler County (Callanan, Sr., J.), rendered December 14, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the third degree.

Insofar as defendant had not been previously arraigned on the subject charges in a local criminal court, notice of presentment of the case to the Grand Jury was not required (see, CPL 190.50 [5] [a]; cf., People v Bey-Allah, 132 AD2d 76). The record also reveals that defendant’s constitutional right to the effec[973]*973tive assistance of counsel was not violated (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 972, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ashford-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack