People v. Asaro

29 A.D.2d 679, 286 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4807

This text of 29 A.D.2d 679 (People v. Asaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Asaro, 29 A.D.2d 679, 286 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County, dated March 27,1967, affirmed, without prejudice to the right of defendant to bring whatever proceeding he deems advisable relating to the proceedings for parole violation. In our opinion the documentary evidence justifies the conclusion that defendant is not entitled to a hearing on his alleged claim of errors and denial of constitutional rights at the trial and sentencing. This record is barren of any of the proceedings that occurred at the time of the apprehension and incarceration of defendant for parole violation. Our decision, therefore, is without prejudice to the right of defendant to seek whatever legal relief, if any, he deems appropriate under the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Mempa v. Rhay (389 U. S. 128). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mempa v. Rhay
389 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 679, 286 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-asaro-nyappdiv-1968.