People v. Asare

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Asare

67 A.D.3d 760, 887 N.Y.S.2d 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.3d 760 (People v. Asare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Asare, 67 A.D.3d 760, 887 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), dated October 25, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Covello, Santucci, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), dated October 25, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Covello, Santucci, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.3d 760, 887 N.Y.S.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-asare-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack