People v. Arvinger

231 A.D.2d 463, 648 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9404

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), rendered March 10, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 to 15 years, and judgment, same court (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered March 29, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a concurrent term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The prosecutor’s summation comments, that the complainant had a "sixth sense” about the possibility of danger as defendant approached and performed a "civic duty” by testifying, were appropriate responses to defendant’s attack on the veracity of the complainant’s identification and his motives for identifying defendant. Furthermore, the prosecutor’s use of the term "you” was in reference to the jury, not defendant, and was properly used the way the word "one” would be. In any event, any impropriety was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt (see, People v Rodriguez, 226 AD2d 281). We have considered defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Arvinger, 231 A.D.2d 463, 648 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

231 A.D.2d 463 (People v. Arvinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
226 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)