People v. Arthur
This text of 748 N.W.2d 879 (People v. Arthur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Henry ARTHUR, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the opinion of the Court of Appeals addressing the issue of the right to self-representation, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
748 N.W.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arthur-mich-2008.