People v. Arthur C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Arthur C.

275 A.D.2d 748, 713 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9242

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed June 10, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[749] The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal, executed at the proceeding conducted on July 22, 1992, precludes him from arguing on appeal that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Pitter, 272 AD2d 416; People v Strunkey, 268 AD2d 492). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed June 10, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[749] The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal, executed at the proceeding conducted on July 22, 1992, precludes him from arguing on appeal that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Pitter, 272 AD2d 416; People v Strunkey, 268 AD2d 492). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

People v. Arthur C., 275 A.D.2d 748, 713 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

275 A.D.2d 748 (People v. Arthur C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related