People v. Arthur C.

275 A.D.2d 748, 713 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9242
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 748 (People v. Arthur C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Arthur C., 275 A.D.2d 748, 713 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed June 10, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[749]*749The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal, executed at the proceeding conducted on July 22, 1992, precludes him from arguing on appeal that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Pitter, 272 AD2d 416; People v Strunkey, 268 AD2d 492). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tripp
277 A.D.2d 262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 748, 713 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arthur-c-nyappdiv-2000.