People v. Arter

California Court of Appeal

People v. Arter

92 Cal. App. 328

California Court of Appeal·Decided May 31, 1928·No. Crim. No. 1465·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant and Bert Palmer were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and both convicted, but the trial court granted Palmer a new trial. The defendant has appealed from the judgment following his conviction and from the order denying him a new trial, but has not supported his appeal by either brief or oral argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The defendant and Bert Palmer were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and both convicted, but the trial court granted Palmer a new trial. The defendant has appealed from the judgment following his conviction and from the order denying him a new trial, but has not supported his appeal by either brief or oral argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.

Judgment and order affirmed.

People v. Arter, 92 Cal. App. 328 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

92 Cal. App. 328 (People v. Arter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.