People v. Arter

California Court of Appeal

People v. Arter

92 Cal. App. 328

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 31, 1928

DocketCrim. No. 1465

StatusPublished

This text of 92 Cal. App. 328 (People v. Arter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Arter, 92 Cal. App. 328 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant and Bert Palmer were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and both convicted, but the trial court granted Palmer a new trial. The defendant has appealed from the judgment following his conviction and from the order denying him a new trial, but has not supported his appeal by either brief or oral argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The defendant and Bert Palmer were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and both convicted, but the trial court granted Palmer a new trial. The defendant has appealed from the judgment following his conviction and from the order denying him a new trial, but has not supported his appeal by either brief or oral argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 Cal. App. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arter-calctapp-1928.