People v. Artebridge
This text of 180 A.D.2d 805 (People v. Artebridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered October 16, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.
The record indicates that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was entirely voluntary and was made with full knowledge of the consequences thereof (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). Furthermore, the terms of the waiver expressly preclude review of the sentence and the defendant withdrew all motions he had made, "either pending or decided” as part of the plea agreement. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 A.D.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-artebridge-nyappdiv-1992.