People v. Arsenault

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Arsenault

105 A.D.2d 841, 481 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20965

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 841 (People v. Arsenault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Arsenault, 105 A.D.2d 841, 481 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Owens, J.), all rendered October 5,1982, convicting him of four counts of burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

[842]*842In the court of first instance, defendant did not raise his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocutions. Thus, he failed, as a matter of law, to preserve these claims for appellate review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857; People v McKenzie, 88 AD2d 646), and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Boyers, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Owens, J.), all rendered October 5,1982, convicting him of four counts of burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

[842]*842In the court of first instance, defendant did not raise his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocutions. Thus, he failed, as a matter of law, to preserve these claims for appellate review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857; People v McKenzie, 88 AD2d 646), and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Boyers, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 841, 481 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arsenault-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack