People v. Arrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Arrington

126 A.D.2d 550, 510 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 550 (People v. Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Arrington, 126 A.D.2d 550, 510 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Braatz, J.), rendered July 16, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (four counts) and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (three counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The resolution of questions relating to the credibility of witnesses is properly a function of the finder of fact, whose determination will not be lightly overturned (People v Gross, 111 AD2d 873; People v Rodriguez, 72 AD2d 571). The trial court’s verdict in the instant case is well supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed. Rubin, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Braatz, J.), rendered July 16, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (four counts) and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (three counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The resolution of questions relating to the credibility of witnesses is properly a function of the finder of fact, whose determination will not be lightly overturned (People v Gross, 111 AD2d 873; People v Rodriguez, 72 AD2d 571). The trial court’s verdict in the instant case is well supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed. Rubin, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 550, 510 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arrington-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack