People v. Arriaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Arriaga

294 A.D.2d 511, 742 N.Y.S.2d 851, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 511 (People v. Arriaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Arriaga, 294 A.D.2d 511, 742 N.Y.S.2d 851, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered March 1, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant expressly waived his right to appeal the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials when he waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831; People v Pierce, 278 AD2d 436). Accordingly, appellate review of this issue is precluded. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered March 1, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant expressly waived his right to appeal the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials when he waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831; People v Pierce, 278 AD2d 436). Accordingly, appellate review of this issue is precluded. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 511, 742 N.Y.S.2d 851, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arriaga-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack