People v. Arpino
This text of 128 A.D.3d 1082 (People v. Arpino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J., at plea; Módica, J., at sentencing), imposed January 9, 2014, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D.3d 1082, 8 N.Y.S.3d 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arpino-nyappdiv-2015.